Back to De Anza College Home Mary "Mhaire" Fraser, Ph.D.
De Anza College | Faculty Directory

Home

Mhaire Fraser Ph. D.
mfraser@alumni.usc.edu


Discussion

Recent Discussion

Create New Topic


Membership

Join Now

Login

daughters

Author:   Mary "Mhaire" Fraser  
Posted: 2/13/2006; 2:23:05 PM
Topic: daughters
Msg #: 183 (top msg in thread)
Prev/Next: 138/
Reads: 8508

Thanks, Daddy's little girl! Congressmen with daughters are more likely to support women's rights, including abortion. Katharine Mieszkowski

Feb. 10, 2006 | We're all for electing more women to Congress. [http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa121198.htm] But while the ratio of men to women serving there remains stuck in the Stone Age, there's a group of unrecognized female power brokers wielding influence on the Hill -- the daughters of congressmen.

Ebonya Washington, [http://www.econ.yale.edu/faculty1/washington.htm] an economist at Yale University, analyzed the records of men in Congress who have daughters compared with those of their daughterless colleagues, and found some surprising results among both Republicans and Democrats. As Washington Post columnist Richard Morin reported [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/07/AR2006020701736.html] this week: "She found that members of the House who have a daughter voted more liberally on a range of women's issues, notably abortion, than those who did not. Moreover, the more daughters a congressman had, the more likely he was to vote for reproductive rights."

And what about the women in Congress? Did having daughters correlate with how they voted on these issues? As Morin notes parenthetically: "(There were not enough female lawmakers to allow Washington to draw firm conclusions about them.)" Sigh.

Maybe some of those congressmen's daughters will be inspired by their dads' careers to run for office one day, too.

-- Katharine Mieszkowski

 Updated Monday, February 13, 2006 at 2:23:05 PM by Mary "Mhaire" Fraser - frasermary@fhda.edu
Login | Logout